Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: LMT monitoring

Re: LMT monitoring

From: Daniel W. Fink <optimaldba_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:25:31 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00564F51.20030310112531@fatcity.com>


 From my testing, I have found the following autoallocate alogrithm. The first 16 extents are 64k in size. The subsequent allocation method is the next 63 extents of 1m, the next 120 extents of 8m and all additional extents at 64m. I have tested this with segments in excess of 100 gigabytes and I did not find a new extent size. The first 3 sizes are documented by Oracle, the last one I found by testing and have verified from other research, though the author/website escapes me at the current time.

-- 
Daniel W. Fink
http://www.optimaldba.com

IOUG-A Live! April 27 - May 1, 2003 Orlando, FL
   Sunday, April 27 8:30am - 4:30pm - Problem Solving with Oracle 9i SQL
   Wednesday, May 1 1:00pm - 2:00pm - Automatic Undo Internals


Jamadagni, Rajendra wrote:


> Rachel,
>
> in case of auto allocate, oracle used 4 or 5 (experts don't even agree
> on if it is 4 or 5) fixed sizes (64k ...) and based on number of
> existing extents it will choose when an extent of next size should be
> allocated. The problem is there is no set formula (or I haven't seen
> one agreed upon by Oracle ... the answer from Oracle is always fuzzy
> about this).
>
> That's why, I don't know if the next extent of my table will be 64K or
> 1M ... if someone knows a formula, I can write a quick script and
> things would be easy ... but due to lack of formula, everything is a
> hypothesis ..
>
> In case of dictionary managed, you have next extent size and pct
> increase and you can predict what the next extent would be. This is
> also true if you use uniformed extents in LMT. But it isn't easy in
> LMT and auto allocate. It is probably as predictable as expecting a
> straight like from a drunken monkey with a crayon.
>
> Raj
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Rajendra dot Jamadagni at espn dot com
> Any views expressed here are strictly personal.
> QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !!
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>********************************************************************This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.*********************************************************************2
>
>
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Daniel W. Fink INET: optimaldba_at_yahoo.com Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:25:31 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US