Return-Path: <root@fatcity.cts.com>
Received: from newsfeed.cts.com (newsfeed.cts.com [209.68.248.164])
 by naude.co.za (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id g7EK9Xh21835
 for <oracle-l@naude.co.za>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:09:33 -0400
Received: from fatcity.UUCP (uucp@localhost)
 by newsfeed.cts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id NAA69695;
 Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fatcity.com (26-Feb-2001/v1.0g-b71/bab) via UUCP id 004B5282; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:33:32 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.004B5282.20020814123332@fatcity.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:33:32 -0800
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L@fatcity.com>
X-Comment: Oracle RDBMS Community Forum
X-Sender: "Gogala, Mladen" <MGogala@oxhp.com>
Sender: root@fatcity.com
Reply-To: ORACLE-L@fatcity.com
Errors-To: ML-ERRORS@fatcity.com
From: "Gogala, Mladen" <MGogala@oxhp.com>
Subject: RE: Is Anybody Aware of Temporary Table Problem in 9i
Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California
X-ListServer: v1.0g, build 71; ListGuru (c) 1996-2001 Bruce A. Bergman
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


What is the duration of the data in the table? Is it session or transaction?
If it's session, you need an intervening commit.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Bootsma [mailto:SamB@cpas.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 3:01 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Is Anybody Aware of Temporary Table Problem in 9i
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> One of our clients has AIX UNIX v4.3.3 OR v5L and Oracle 9.1. 
>   They have
> problems with temporary tables as shown in the two scenarios below.
> 
> Scenario 1:  In one procedure, we insert into a temporary table.  In a
> different procedure we select from the same temporary table.  
> We use the
> same connection (same session) and there is no intervening 
> commit.  The
> select returns no data.  
> 
> Scenario 2: In the same procedure, insert into a temporary 
> table then select
> from the same table.  The select is successful.
> 
> *********************************
> 
> When we run the same scenarios using Windows 2000 and Oracle 9.1, both
> scenario's return data.
> 
> Has anybody experienced problems with temporary tables on Oracle 9.1?
> Especially on UNIX.  Is anybody aware of Oracle bugs?
> 
> Appreciate any responses.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Sam Bootsma, OCP
> Technical Support Analyst
> CPAS Systems Inc.
> 416-422-0563 x237
> samb@cpas.com
> http://www.cpas.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> -- 
> Author: Sam Bootsma
>   INET: SamB@cpas.com
> 
> Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
> 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: MGogala@oxhp.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

