Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: what is wrong with this idea ...

Re: what is wrong with this idea ...

From: Manavendra Gupta <manav_at_zycus.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:48:34 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.004B467E.20020814064834@fatcity.com>


With individual columns you save on the CPU cycles/time involved to parse the string and extract each character.
Additionally, if you ever need to update this string, it would be tedious. IMO, its always better to have atomic data since one can then leverage the features of the DBMS.

With Warm Regards,
Manav.

> Hi. We have a table in our data warehouse which keeps
> info about calls made. This table has a child table
> with some detailed information about parts of the
> call. There may be any number of "parts" within a call
> (1 to many) and every part has a status.
>
> MY developer wants to add a string field to the parent
> table which will concatinate all the statuses for
> all the parts within this call. For example if
> a call has 4 parts and their statuses are "A","B","A"
> and "F", the value of that field will be "ABFA". Then
> the developer will be able to query smalle parent
> table instead of a large child table in order to see
> how many calls had at least one part with status "A"
> or statuses "A" and "F" etc by using a INSTR (or
> SUBSTR) command.
>
> Would it be better (from performance/CPU standpoint)
> to add several separate fields: STATUS_A_CNT,
> STATUS_B_CNT (the list of status codes is fairly
> static) instead? There is something about this string
> that rubs me the wrong way, but I can't put my finger
> on it.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> thank you
>
> Gene
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
> http://www.hotjobs.com
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author: Gurelei
> INET: gurelei_at_yahoo.com
>
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Manavendra Gupta
  INET: manav_at_zycus.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Wed Aug 14 2002 - 09:48:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US