From ktoepke@cms.cendant.com Fri, 27 Apr 2001 04:51:39 -0700 From: "Toepke, Kevin M" Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 04:51:39 -0700 Subject: RE: parallel load performance Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain I got SQL*Loader to run faster in parallel. I was loading a 8 million record file that was about 800-bytes wide. What I wound up doing was splitting the file into n separate files. My control file looked similar to yours, except it didn't have the INFILE parameter... I called sqlldr with the DATA= parameter on the command line. You may want to try this. Kevin Toepke -----Original Message----- Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 7:16 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I'm getting slower loads using parallel than a serial load. I set up a test case and am pasting it for you to see what I am doing wrong. -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Toepke, Kevin M INET: ktoepke@cms.cendant.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).