From daemon Mon Feb 26 16:37:16 1996 Received: from ccvm.sunysb.edu by alice.jcc.com; (5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/01Aug94-0142PM) id AA22032; Mon, 26 Feb 1996 16:37:14 -0500 Message-Id: <9602262137.AA22032@alice.jcc.com> Received: from CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU by ccvm.sunysb.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with BSMTP id 4985; Mon, 26 Feb 96 16:31:03 EST Received: from CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@SBCCVM) by CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8630; Mon, 26 Feb 1996 16:31:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 15:31:27 -0600 Reply-To: "ORACLE database mailing list." Sender: "ORACLE database mailing list." From: Debang Guo Subject: Re: SQLNet 2.1.4 & Windows 95 X-To: "ORACLE database mailing list." X-Cc: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Hi There is a Bulletin from Oracle Support Prob# 1003522.6 discussed about SQL*NET for Desktop. The following part is for Windows 95: ----- SQL*NET availability for Win95 SQL*NET V1 SQL*Net v1.1.6.9 Avail SQL*NET V2 SQL*NET v2.2.2.1.0 Avail TCP/IP Adapter v2.2.2.1.0 Avail SPX Adapter v2.2.2.1.0 Avail Named Pipes v2.2.2.1.0 Avail Adapter v2.2.2.1.0 Avail Please note: The only supported TCP/IP stack is the Native Windows 95 stack. ------ This information may be old, but if you are using TCP/IP network, the last sentence above may be of interest. Best. ================================================================== Debang Guo | Phone: (615)898-5062 Office of Information Technology | Fax: (615)898-5720 Box 119 | Middle Tennessee State University | E-mail: deguo@frank.mtsu.edu Murfreesboro, TN 37132 | ================================================================== On Mon, 26 Feb 1996, Oracle Dba wrote: > Oracle support says that SQLNet 2.1.4 can be safely loaded on Windows 95 > and work properly. > > From what I have read on this list, a lot of you think otherwise. Have any > of you had successful installations and am I worrying about earlier SQLNet > v2 releases? > > Is the list of vendors as outlined by the SQLNet IP installation window the > only vendors that SQLNET will work with? If not on the list, can I be > successful in picking the Windows Socket generic that appears at top of list? > > Thanks for any help. > > Paul Lavoie > National Research Council Canada > oracldba@cdsys.nrc.ca >