UNDO vs. Rollback Segments [message #204034] |
Fri, 17 November 2006 07:21 |
Frank Naude
Messages: 4582 Registered: April 1998
|
Senior Member |
|
|
How would you respond if an application vendor tells you:
Quote: | Another issue that COPMANYX noticed from their analysis of the information provided, is the use of UNDO tablespaces instead of rollback segments. You indicated that you use UNDO instead of rollback segments as it is easier and more efficient. However, COMPANYX indicated that the product has not been tested this way, and that you should use rollback segments. Can you please indicate if this is acceptable?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: UNDO vs. Rollback Segments [message #204640 is a reply to message #204318] |
Tue, 21 November 2006 08:30 |
Frank Naude
Messages: 4582 Registered: April 1998
|
Senior Member |
|
|
You cannot win with these guys:
Quote: | We've logged an enhancement request to support UNDO MANAGEMENT (Feature introduced in Oracle 9i).
They (the user) are right about known issues with rollback segments. But, there are also bugs with REDO MANAGEMENT. We do NOT support it yet...
|
They will definitely get my vote for worst Oracle implementation of the year! Just a pity I cannot name names.
|
|
|