guys, i'm sincerely sorry i lose temper back there. You certainly didn't deserve that kind of treatment from me. i think You were just trying to protect each other from my nonsense.
just, it took me so long to reach this stage of knowledge (in whatever infancy state it is). particularly, 15 years of thinking and thinking and thinking. you can imagine under what pressure i am for reaching so little in so much time.
Since I've got some experience about databases and SQL, one assumption constantly twinkled in my head: there has to be a better way for defining databases. I was imagining some cool and neat model for representing tables, records and relations that will simply "be the one". Since then I have experimented with different exotic visual representations of data that was crossing my mind. And then I saw it! It was literally love at first sight. The same power of SQL's database defining, but with much simpler rules. So simple that I decided to give it a name. The name was Binary Relational Modeling.
After setting up a dedicated site, I entered the same name in Google and realized that similar (if not the same) approaches already exist, even under the same name. After initial shock, when I gathered myself in, I found myself surprised why a wider use of the technology isn't already in a full swing by now. So I decided to share my experiences with programmers interested in alternative database technologies.
i hope You will forgive me for loosing temper, i was under great pressure. i'll try to be a good one from now on, i promise :x
