Re: SUPPORT FOR DECLARATIVE TRANSITION CONSTRAINTS
From: Erwin <e.smout_at_myonline.be>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6c21ee4c-372b-4285-8d89-4db6c00540ce_at_26g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6c21ee4c-372b-4285-8d89-4db6c00540ce_at_26g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
I was not making any assumption.
I said this: "it was you defined such propositions as irrelevant when
you said that no other relvars say anything about employee names".
But of course including that particular piece of text in your answer
wouldn't make you look good, or sound bite, of course.