Re: <OR> predicate?

From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:12:37 GMT
Message-ID: <VU6oo.1253$89.661_at_edtnps83>


On 27/09/2010 11:49 AM, paul c wrote:
> On 27/09/2010 11:22 AM, Vadim Tropashko wrote:
...
> Vadim, thank you for going to the trouble to show that, ie., if I'm
> reading your syntax correctly, it means that R <AND> (<NOT> R) = R <OR>
> TABLE_DEE, as I thought.

Oops, I meant R <OR> (<NOT> R) = R <OR> TABLE_DEE. Received on Mon Sep 27 2010 - 22:12:37 CEST

Original text of this message