Re: SUPPORT FOR DECLARATIVE TRANSITION CONSTRAINTS
From: Erwin <e.smout_at_myonline.be>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 04:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ebd82998-831a-4ee6-87be-28e3c5dd348f_at_t3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 04:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ebd82998-831a-4ee6-87be-28e3c5dd348f_at_t3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
On 23 sep, 10:25, Cimode <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Heh, here we go again, more attacking mutant tuples, but thanks for a
> > great example of undersimplification.
>
> *Attacking mutant tuples* ?
>
> That was the funniest quote I have heard all day. Thanks paul...:)
They are the relational incarnation of "feeping creatures". Received on Thu Sep 23 2010 - 13:14:19 CEST