Re: SUPPORT FOR DECLARATIVE TRANSITION CONSTRAINTS
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:21:58 GMT
Message-ID: <WKMlo.992$89.342_at_edtnps83>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:21:58 GMT
Message-ID: <WKMlo.992$89.342_at_edtnps83>
On 20/09/2010 9:42 AM, paul c wrote:
...
> transaction. He could just as easily amend the 'first' work order in one
> transaction and amend the 'second' one in another transaction, or he
> could be provided with an interface to do that....
Typo': in the interest of being as accurate as the example allows, I should have written 'labour activity', not 'work order'. Received on Mon Sep 20 2010 - 19:21:58 CEST