Re: RM VERY STRONG SUGGESTION 4: TRANSITION CONSTRAINTS
From: Brian <brian_at_selzer-software.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a07acbac-ea49-4192-98e2-d7d3cce6581a_at_a11g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a07acbac-ea49-4192-98e2-d7d3cce6581a_at_a11g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 9, 1:08 pm, Erwin <e.sm..._at_myonline.be> wrote:
> On 9 sep, 04:41, Brian <br..._at_selzer-software.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > When I'm wrong, I admit that I'm wrong. I don't think I'm wrong, and
> > nobody has offerred an irrefutable argument that proves me wrong;
> > therefore, I have to conclude that I'm right.
> > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
>
> Intricate that in this particular case, all of a sudden you DO make
> the switch to 2VL, eliminating the possibility that your-being-right-
> or-wrong might still be unknown.
I never switched away from 2VL. You just assume that I had. You are wrong. Received on Thu Sep 09 2010 - 23:13:15 CEST