Re: On the usefulness of tables definitions in RM...
From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <i4n345$20u$1_at_speranza.aioe.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <i4n345$20u$1_at_speranza.aioe.org>
Cimode wrote:
>> I then remind the class that the tabular appearance is merely a happy
>> accident.
> Thanks for this insight. I am curious as to what do you think is
Nothing, I hope. Or rather, I hope they are disuaded that the tabular
representation has any special significance. At the very least I hope
they don't leave saying things like "tables are two-dimensional".
But perhaps you are asking if they discern a distinction between table
> gained by your students, in the perspective of understanding
> relations, in going through such efforts.
-- RoyReceived on Sat Aug 21 2010 - 01:29:09 CEST