Re: compound propositions
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:28:25 GMT
Message-ID: <t%Xnn.68302$Db2.30816_at_edtnps83>
>
> Don't confuse the conceptual and logical levels of discourse. You will
> only end up talking nonsense.
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:28:25 GMT
Message-ID: <t%Xnn.68302$Db2.30816_at_edtnps83>
Bob Badour wrote:
> paul c wrote:
>
>> Nilone wrote: >> >>> On Mar 16, 7:12 pm, paul c <toledobythe..._at_oohay.ac> wrote: >>> >>>> Must admit I've never understood what is the important difference >>>> between a tuple and an entity, other than that some people would rather >>>> talk about entities instead of tuples. >>> >>> My current understanding is that a tuple is a proposition which may >>> describe one or more entities, while an entity is an abstraction which >>> may be described by any number of tuples in any number of relations. >>> ... >> >> I would say tuples are abstractions, also that they are not >> propositions, just partial representations. (While I don't object to >> an entity being called an abstraction, the word often confuses me >> because some people give the impression it's not abstract.)
>
> Don't confuse the conceptual and logical levels of discourse. You will
> only end up talking nonsense.
Heh, probably good advice. If I understand it, it means the middle ground in these topics is treacherous, likely futile and possibly only a refuge for mystics. Received on Wed Mar 17 2010 - 04:28:25 CET