Re: no names allowed, we serve types only
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:12:24 -0800
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:03:08 -0800 (PST), David BL <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
>I would have thought that if you were actually interested in more
>detail you would choose a different tact than to be offensive (which
>invariably has the opposite outcome). It suggests your motives are
>far from sincere.
Wow! That is two posts in a row where you are claiming my motives are disreputable. Is this your example of the politeness that you claim I am not showing? Are you going to go for three?
Gene Wirchenko Received on Wed Mar 03 2010 - 22:12:24 CET