Re: no names allowed, we serve types only

From: David BL <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:50:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <89674409-6be9-4dfe-8227-635b93c2a1c5_at_m27g2000prl.googlegroups.com>

On Feb 25, 6:51 am, Gene Wirchenko <ge..._at_ocis.net> wrote:

> >If you are not convinced that's not my problem. I've already hinted at
> >what my counterargument for the specific issue under discussion would
> >be. If you want to debate that, don't let me stop you.
>
> Oooh! You gave a hint! How thoughtful. </sarcasm>

Brevity's hardly a sin so what's really behind the </sarcasm>? To be frank I'm finding it hard to think of anything that does you credit. Received on Tue Mar 02 2010 - 04:50:47 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gene Wirchenko: "Re: no names allowed, we serve types only"
Previous message: Mia: "a brand new query tool is out on beta, we need feedback, so you get a free copy"
Next in thread: Gene Wirchenko: "Re: no names allowed, we serve types only"
Reply: Gene Wirchenko: "Re: no names allowed, we serve types only"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message