Re: Fitch's paradox and OWA
From: Daryl McCullough <stevendaryl3016_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 31 Dec 2009 20:30:36 -0800
Message-ID: <hhjtpc0g9a_at_drn.newsguy.com>
Date: 31 Dec 2009 20:30:36 -0800
Message-ID: <hhjtpc0g9a_at_drn.newsguy.com>
Barb Knox says...
>
>In article
><a3f061ed-3838-4be9-b73a-836141dc640f_at_u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
> Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was more under the impression that Goedel showed there
>> was no complete finite theory of them, rather than no
>> way to define them. Are you saying those are equivalent?
>
>Yes, in this context. Since we are finite beings we need to use finite
>systems.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NYReceived on Fri Jan 01 2010 - 05:30:36 CET