Re: Fitch's paradox and OWA

Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:10:33 -0700, Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen_at_shaw.ca>
> wrote:
>

>> Marshall wrote:

>>> There is simply no issue here to respond to. Everything you've
>>> said here is either false or else it's the same as the conclusion
>>> you're trying to establish.
>> Great "refute" you seem to have had here! Among "everything" I've said here
>> are a) and b). Why do you think they're false? Or you just said so out of the
>> habit of saying things with no back-up reasons?
>>
>> Btw, usually "conclusion" is "the same" thing as what one would be "trying to
>> establish". You seemed to be surprise of that. Why?


> 

>      I am impressed with the speed that you showed yourself a fool

This is a public forum and hence fwiw I don't have interest or concern about someone is being killfiled by anybody or not. All I'm doing in here is listing to people's rationale to see what is what in mathematical reasoning.

Regards,

Nam Nguyen

>
> Sincerely,
>
> Gene Wirchenko
Received on Fri Jan 01 2010 - 04:40:46 CET