Re: Fitch's paradox and OWA
From: Daryl McCullough <stevendaryl3016_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 30 Dec 2009 19:51:15 -0800
Message-ID: <hhh73j015b5_at_drn.newsguy.com>
Date: 30 Dec 2009 19:51:15 -0800
Message-ID: <hhh73j015b5_at_drn.newsguy.com>
Nam Nguyen says...
>
>Daryl McCullough wrote:
>> By the way, I haven't thought about it a huge amount, but I
>> don't have any problems with the paradox, because I don't
>> accept the premise: Every true proposition is potentially knowable.
>
>> It seems to me that sufficiently complex true propositions may never
>> be known.
>
>But how can we know it's true in the first place, when its being true
>can't be known?
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NYReceived on Thu Dec 31 2009 - 04:51:15 CET