Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys
From: Philipp Post <post.philipp_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <61f6b289-7560-4b07-b4fa-8c24627f0693_at_h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <61f6b289-7560-4b07-b4fa-8c24627f0693_at_h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
> Tell me what you think, and sorry for going into essay length. <
But what about using an artificial key? I. e. create your own encoding scheme, for example SMITHPA00001 for a person called "Paul Smith". Being fixed lenght, possibly with a check digit at the end. Some difficulties may arise with asian languages, where you would have to transcribe them first.
Could be worth a try, prior you go with a surrogate or physical locator instead.
brgds
Philipp Post Received on Fri Sep 18 2009 - 16:18:59 CEST