Re: Hierarchical data models
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 17, 4:10 am, Tegiri Nenashi <tegirinena..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 16, 1:21 pm, Nilone <rea..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 16, 7:16 pm, Tegiri Nenashi <tegirinena..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > That would be XML -- a robust and well established data model applied
> > > universally to any problem.
> > XML can represent it, yes. I'll investigate further in this
> > direction.
> Well, you missed two subtle points. First, I borrowed the word
> "robust" from some computer climate modeler who used it dozen times in
> his last paper. Second, XML is far from being a just a data model, let
> alone "well established" one.
> To make it crystal clear, I was kidding in the XML part of my message;
> the other part was serious.
LOL, that's funny! I was humoring you, and "able to represent" was as much credit as I was willing to give XML. I'm happy to hear I misjudged your post. Received on Mon Aug 17 2009 - 11:14:14 CEST