Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September

From: Mr. Scott <do_not_reply_at_noone.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:57:48 -0400
Message-ID: <vsydnVYdzqRw1R7XnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d_at_giganews.com>

"paul c" <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac> wrote in message news:IYAgm.40873$PH1.30537_at_edtnps82...
> Mr. Scott wrote:
> ...
>> I'm confused. What requirement are you referring to? Are you referring
>> to the requirement that nulls be eliminated or the fact that an order
>> isn't an order without a delivery destination? The referential cycle was
>> a consequence of trying to eliminate nulls. ...
>
> I meant the requirement that a delivery address can't be recorded without
> an order date.

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]