Re: Entity and Identity

From: Nilone <reaanb_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 01:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <41cc773d-71c4-4f96-830f-a174fd04c8c7_at_d32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>

On Aug 4, 1:30�am, rp_at_raampje.(none) (Reinier Post) wrote:
> Nilone wrote:
> >I'm opposing OO as implemented in the current suite of mainstream
> >languages - more specifically, I'm opposing the class systems of
> >mainstream languages. �I have no problem with state machines.
>
> Then how do you express them? �How do you express state change?
>
> --
> Reinier

I realize that the mechanisms of OO classes are suited (I suppose I'll yield to the point of saying well-suited) to creating state machines. I still believe that some of these mechanisms (e.g. implementation inheritance) are problematic for this purpose. Received on Tue Aug 04 2009 - 10:23:10 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Walter Mitty: "Re: Does entity integrity imply entity identity?"
Previous message: Mr. Scott: "Re: Does entity integrity imply entity identity?"
Maybe in reply to: none: "Re: Entity and Identity"
In reply to none: "Re: Entity and Identity"
Next in thread: none: "Re: Entity and Identity"
Reply: none: "Re: Entity and Identity"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message