Re: Why is "group by" obligatory in SQL?

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b22f3d0d-ba21-48c5-925b-ac703cc2d25e_at_18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>


On 24 juil, 19:29, paul c <toledobythe..._at_oohay.ac> wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > I do have a few responses based on subtyping but nobody wants to hear
> > them.
> > ...
>
> I would.  

Well then it would require more than a thread. With the best intentions I can not summarize in a thread what has been a weekend crunching obsession in the last 10 years. But I do appreciate your interest. Thanks. Received on Fri Jul 24 2009 - 20:56:52 CEST

Original text of this message