Re: [ann] hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you)

From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:13:47 -0500
Message-ID: <>

Christoph Rupp wrote:

> Dear comp.databases.theory Group,
> over the last one or two years you helped me a couple of times when i
> asked silly questions, mainly about transactions, isolation levels
> etc.

You are welcome.

> The next releases will improve performance, improve win32 and add more
> features (Cursors, duplicate keys, more transaction isolation
> levels...)

Not supporting cursors would actually be a good *feature* IMO.

"Duplicate keys" sounds like it could be a contradiction in terms, unless you are talking about duplicate (non-unique) *physical* keys.

Received on Mon Jul 20 2009 - 14:13:47 CEST

Original text of this message