Re: identifying entities across database updates
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:23:53 -0300
Message-ID: <4a5eb874$0$23775$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> [snip]
>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:23:53 -0300
Message-ID: <4a5eb874$0$23775$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> You are agreeing with me. Turing machines are simple. Simple >>>comes at the cost of pretty. You can add pretty, but then you have >>>something more complex. >> >>Are you saying lambda calculus is more complex?prettiness and elegance. The lambda calculus accomplishes the same as the turing machine only with more beauty and elegance.
>
> No. I was discussing Turing machines.
True, but that's not all you were discussing. You were also discussing
I recommend you search the EWD archive for what Dijkstra has to say about elegance. Received on Thu Jul 16 2009 - 07:23:53 CEST