Re: identifying entities across database updates
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:06:48 -0300
Message-ID: <4a5d46d3$0$23777$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
>
> [snip]
>
>
> something more complex.
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:06:48 -0300
Message-ID: <4a5d46d3$0$23777$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>
>>Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> >> >>>Tegiri Nenashi <TegiriNenashi_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> [snip]
>
>
>>>>It is remarkable that among different models of computations the >>>>ugliest one won. >>> >>> Not really. At this level, the simplest set of axioms wins. The >>>ugliness is called elegance. One builds on top of the simple to get >>>the pretty stuff. >>> >>>[snip] >> >>Nah. Turing machines are fugly.> comes at the cost of pretty. You can add pretty, but then you have
>
> You are agreeing with me. Turing machines are simple. Simple
> something more complex.
Are you saying lambda calculus is more complex? Received on Wed Jul 15 2009 - 05:06:48 CEST