Re: Using the RM for ADTs

From: none <rp_at_raampje.>
Date: 13 Jul 2009 23:23:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4a5bc1e6$0$8579$703f8584_at_news.kpn.nl>

PS I just wrote

[...]

>This is possible, but not with a fixed schema.
>And it is extremely impractical. E.g. it will not be possible
>to ever issue a database that breaks a symmetry:

                update --^

Sorry.

-- 
Reinier

Received on Tue Jul 14 2009 - 01:23:18 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tegiri Nenashi: "Re: identifying entities across database updates (was: Is a function a relation?)"
Previous message: none: "Re: identifying entities across database updates (was: Is a function a relation?)"
Maybe in reply to: David BL: "Using the RM for ADTs"
In reply to none: "Re: Using the RM for ADTs"
Next in thread: Brian Selzer: "Re: Using the RM for ADTs"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message