Re: ID field as logical address

From: Kevin Kirkpatrick <>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <>

On Jun 1, 11:39 am, "Brian Selzer" <> wrote:
> "Kevin Kirkpatrick" <> wrote in message
> > What is the poor HR person to do when Mary Smith returns from a week
> > long Vegas trip and reports that she'd gotten married on Monday and
> > divorced on Friday?
> That should be obvious: issue two updates in succession, one for each event.

Am I reading that right? You think the data entry person should enter, as a fact to the database, "Mary Smith is currently Married", at a time when Mary Smith is definitely not married? Received on Mon Jun 01 2009 - 19:17:00 CEST

Original text of this message