Re: ID field as logical address

From: Bob Badour <>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:33:06 -0300
Message-ID: <4a23e630$0$23773$>

Kevin Kirkpatrick wrote:

> On May 31, 2:12 am, "Walter Mitty" <> wrote:

>>"Brian Selzer" <> wrote in message
>>>"Walter Mitty" <> wrote in message
>>>>"paul c" <> wrote in message
>>>>>Just a couple of comments about a post that is unusually vague and fuzzy
>>>>>coming from you, it's tedious to dismantle every sentence, so I mention
>>>>>only a couple:
>>>>I apologize for how vague and fuzzy this topic is.  If my wording is
>>>>vague and fuzzy, my thinking is even more vague and fuzzy.


>>>{{L:Smith, F:Mary, Stat:Single, L':Smith, F':Mary, Stat':Divorced}}

> What is the poor HR person to do when Mary Smith returns from a week
> long Vegas trip and reports that she'd gotten married on Monday and
> divorced on Friday?

Wouldn't it make more sense to just ask the OP to re-post in comp.databases.vague.fuzzy ? Received on Mon Jun 01 2009 - 16:33:06 CEST

Original text of this message