Re: storing survey answers of different data types
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:31:39 GMT
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:05:00 +1000, paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac> wrote:
> Bob Badour wrote:
>> paul c wrote: >> >>> Bob Badour wrote: >>> >>>> Joe Thurbon wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>>> Just wondering, if one of the requirements for a system included >>>>> something like 'Be able to list all questionnaires', would >>>>> you still consider one-table-per-questionairre a reasonable design? >>>> >>>> >>>> Absolutely. It's a simple query from the system catalog. >>>> ... >>> >>> How do you tell the 'questionnaire' tables from the other tables? >> However you want. >
> Well, it's not me, the part-time mystic, I'd like to know how a system
> catalog/catalogue can signify the difference. Seems to me that the
> system becomes the app, which would be okay by me. 'Catlog', all due
> respect to Codd, is not a very useful word. What's the point of ddl
> when dml could suffice? I think it is baggage, mostly due to the
> physical limits of thirty or more years ago. DBMS's would be different
> today if not for those, and thirty years from now, most developers
> won't even know and a few might start to think like the Mott's Clamato
> man. So there!
Well, I googled "Mott Clamato man" expecting to see some sort of literary reference. That's not exactly what I got.
Suffice to say, I was following you until you brought him up. What would Mott's Clamato man think?
Joe Received on Thu Apr 23 2009 - 23:31:39 CDT