comp.databases.theory: by date

Monday, 1 December
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Walter Mitty
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
Tuesday, 2 December
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Walter Mitty
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
Wednesday, 3 December
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer
Friday, 5 December
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Bob Badour
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Ed Prochak
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Gints Plivna
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Bob Badour
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? DBMS_Plumber
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer
Saturday, 6 December
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Roy Hann
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Gints Plivna
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Bob Badour
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
Sunday, 7 December
- EISWT-09 call for papers john
Monday, 8 December
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Ed Prochak
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Bob Badour
- how to design db ilochab
- Re: how to design db Bob Badour
- Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: how to design db Volker Hetzer
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
Tuesday, 9 December
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost
- Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language rpost
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language paul c
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language paul c
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language paul c
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language paul c
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode
Wednesday, 10 December
- Re: how to design db ilochab
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' JOG
Thursday, 11 December
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: how to design db Volker Hetzer
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' Bob Badour
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' Bob Badour
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' JOG
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
Friday, 12 December
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' JOG
- Re: how to design db rpost
- Re: how to design db rpost
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language paul c
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language paul c
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language paul c
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language vadimtro_at_gmail.com
Saturday, 13 December
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode
- Call for Papers: The 2009 World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing (WORLDCOMP'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 A. M. G. Solo
- Call for Papers: The 2009 International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 A. M. G. Solo
Sunday, 14 December
- Call for Papers: The 2009 International Conference on Foundations of Computer Science (FCS'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 A. M. G. Solo
- simple db - how am I doing so far? strongsilentone_at_gmail.com
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' Brian Selzer
Monday, 15 December
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' Brian Selzer
- A different definition of MINUS, Part 1 paul c
Tuesday, 16 December
- Re: simple db - how am I doing so far? Ed Prochak
- A different definition of MINUS, Part 2 paul c
Wednesday, 17 December
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 1 Brian Selzer
- A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 1 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Brian Selzer
Thursday, 18 December
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
Friday, 19 December
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
Saturday, 20 December
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Brian Selzer
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Bob Badour
Sunday, 21 December
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Walter Mitty
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
Monday, 22 December
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Brian Selzer
Tuesday, 23 December
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Walter Mitty
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
- algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 paul c
Wednesday, 24 December
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Cimode
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints paul c
- Bioinformatics Databases Rb
Friday, 26 December
- A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c
Saturday, 27 December
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Brian Selzer
Sunday, 28 December
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Cimode
Monday, 29 December
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints paul c
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints paul c
Tuesday, 30 December
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Walter Mitty
- Mike Carey on data modeling (and other videos) knorth
- Re: Mike Carey on data modeling (and other videos) knorth
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Bob Badour
Wednesday, 31 December
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Cimode
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer salmobytes
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c

Last message date: Wed Dec 31 2008 - 20:25:26 CST
Archived on: Wed Dec 31 2008 - 20:42:02 CST

198 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]