- A. M. G. Solo
- Call for Papers: The 2009 International Conference on Foundations of Computer Science (FCS'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 (Sun Dec 14 2008 - 13:50:35 CET)
- Call for Papers: The 2009 International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 (Sun Dec 14 2008 - 05:10:23 CET)
- Call for Papers: The 2009 World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing (WORLDCOMP'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 (Sat Dec 13 2008 - 14:19:23 CET)
- Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Wed Dec 31 2008 - 22:09:01 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Wed Dec 31 2008 - 04:58:30 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 19:19:24 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 17:37:38 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 07:36:45 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 04:18:42 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 02:34:37 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 01:13:12 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 20:53:46 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 03:32:15 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 00:26:55 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 23:35:36 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 00:06:27 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 23:03:49 CET)
- Re: how to design db (Mon Dec 08 2008 - 20:02:58 CET)
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? (Mon Dec 08 2008 - 16:50:47 CET)
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? (Sat Dec 06 2008 - 20:19:16 CET)
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? (Fri Dec 05 2008 - 22:34:54 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Fri Dec 05 2008 - 16:53:28 CET)
- Brian Selzer
- Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Wed Dec 31 2008 - 10:13:43 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 23:49:54 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 15:10:08 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Wed Dec 24 2008 - 11:38:54 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 12:53:20 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 10:50:46 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 21:22:02 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 13:26:47 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 11:52:25 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:48:49 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:26:15 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:25:06 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Thu Dec 18 2008 - 21:36:38 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Thu Dec 18 2008 - 21:31:32 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Sat Dec 13 2008 - 13:29:44 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Sat Dec 13 2008 - 10:17:34 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 13:48:18 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 11:16:35 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Wed Dec 10 2008 - 01:44:49 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Wed Dec 10 2008 - 01:42:44 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 23:46:21 CET)
- Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 14:35:43 CET)
- DBMS_Plumber
- Ed Prochak
- Gints Plivna
- ilochab
- JOG
- john
- knorth
- paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Wed Dec 31 2008 - 22:35:42 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Wed Dec 31 2008 - 21:55:26 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Wed Dec 31 2008 - 21:40:37 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Mon Dec 29 2008 - 23:45:23 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Mon Dec 29 2008 - 17:05:19 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Mon Dec 29 2008 - 16:33:07 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Mon Dec 29 2008 - 15:56:04 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 18:30:53 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 16:40:38 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 14:56:11 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 13:58:48 CET)
- A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Fri Dec 26 2008 - 20:37:37 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Wed Dec 24 2008 - 16:24:04 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Wed Dec 24 2008 - 01:46:08 CET)
- algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Wed Dec 24 2008 - 01:09:06 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Tue Dec 23 2008 - 15:41:04 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 06:14:59 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 01:34:39 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 23:49:25 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 18:33:41 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 17:39:07 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 03:03:28 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 00:02:53 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 23:03:58 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 17:00:46 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 16:40:18 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 16:36:29 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 21:54:12 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 21:47:40 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 21:23:06 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:37:54 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:16:23 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 16:02:10 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 15:47:32 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Wed Dec 17 2008 - 21:29:12 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Wed Dec 17 2008 - 17:29:46 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Wed Dec 17 2008 - 15:44:21 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 1 (Wed Dec 17 2008 - 15:23:55 CET)
- A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Wed Dec 17 2008 - 15:09:39 CET)
- A different definition of MINUS, Part 2 (Tue Dec 16 2008 - 18:51:56 CET)
- A different definition of MINUS, Part 1 (Tue Dec 16 2008 - 01:35:16 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Mon Dec 15 2008 - 21:33:53 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Mon Dec 15 2008 - 21:25:01 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 22:00:44 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 21:55:07 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 21:15:34 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 21:01:48 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 20:58:34 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 20:48:36 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 14:37:26 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Wed Dec 10 2008 - 00:33:16 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Wed Dec 10 2008 - 00:17:35 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Wed Dec 10 2008 - 00:14:02 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 20:12:52 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 19:33:51 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 18:01:18 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 17:46:57 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 00:16:23 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Mon Dec 08 2008 - 23:59:51 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Mon Dec 08 2008 - 20:27:27 CET)
- Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Mon Dec 08 2008 - 20:24:38 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Sat Dec 06 2008 - 22:38:07 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Fri Dec 05 2008 - 17:53:21 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Fri Dec 05 2008 - 16:37:58 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Wed Dec 03 2008 - 15:48:46 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Wed Dec 03 2008 - 15:19:31 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Wed Dec 03 2008 - 02:11:07 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 23:50:18 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 17:05:05 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 15:43:29 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 15:22:03 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 15:19:17 CET)
- Rb
- Roy Hann
- rpost
- strongsilentone_at_gmail.com
- vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 18:23:14 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 07:34:10 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 07:32:52 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 07:22:42 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 03:04:37 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 21:40:12 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 20:49:56 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 20:36:54 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 20:30:16 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:56:49 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 19:29:57 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 (Thu Dec 18 2008 - 22:17:30 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 22:37:17 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 22:29:06 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 21:49:18 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 19:31:09 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 18:55:11 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 04:11:02 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 02:49:14 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 00:22:56 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 23:36:01 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 23:24:48 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 22:48:37 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 22:28:55 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 20:31:52 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 20:11:47 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 19:51:54 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 01:36:15 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 01:13:42 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' (Mon Dec 08 2008 - 22:32:35 CET)
- Volker Hetzer
- Walter Mitty
- Last message date: Wed Dec 31 2008 - 22:35:42 CET
- Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 23:55:14 CEST
|