Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
From: Walter Mitty <wamitty_at_verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:21:49 GMT
Message-ID: <1u64l.708$Es4.168_at_nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:21:49 GMT
Message-ID: <1u64l.708$Es4.168_at_nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"paul c" <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac> wrote in message
news:V4v3l.4$an4.3_at_newsfe08.iad...
> paul c wrote:
> ...
>>
>>
>> ... Projection and <REMOVE> are always fundamental. ...
>>
>
> Oops, should have said <REMOVE> (projection) and <RENAME> are always
> fundamental.
Is this right? Received on Tue Dec 23 2008 - 15:21:49 CET