Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 07:40:18 -0800
Message-ID: <Fk83l.48994$mY6.516_at_newsfe10.iad>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 07:40:18 -0800
Message-ID: <Fk83l.48994$mY6.516_at_newsfe10.iad>
paul c wrote:
...
> As best as I can understand him, McGoveran wants to prohibit certain
> relvar values. While I don't argue that this will solve the language
> problem of 'view updating', ...
Oops, meant to type "I don't argue that this WON'T eliminate the language problem ...". Received on Sat Dec 20 2008 - 16:40:18 CET