Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:25:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <e08b5425-4164-446e-b873-4e07a190544d_at_w1g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:25:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <e08b5425-4164-446e-b873-4e07a190544d_at_w1g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
[Snipped example]
<<As soon as they started
making premises, they lost me because it doesn't look like their
method is anything more than case analysis that have any chances to
be
scaled up to practical problems. >>
Precisely. I would go further as to say that hoping that using solely
algebra would be sufficient to achieve such resultis nothing more than
the holy graal of RL. As you mentionned in an earlier post, the
example of lack of quantifiersi is one major obstacle most current
DandD work seem to ignore without consequence or awareness of the
price to pay.
Regards.. . Received on Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:25:06 CET