Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:19:17 GMT
Message-ID: <FnSYk.1428$yK5.5_at_edtnps82>
rpost wrote:
For all we know, the OP's forum could be some idiosyncratic mutant, eg.,
one-user-at-a-time and synchronous. I'd say it would be more useful to
...
>
> To which he replied: but a forum message is often a reply, and in that case,
> a reply to a specific other message; this is not a presentation feature
> but a basic structural property of his forum (and of USENET as well);
> not just of the implementation but at the functional requirement level.
> You seemed to be flat-out denying this, which raised the question:
> how would *you* model USENET or his forum?
> ...
I doubt if after that, there would remain any pertinent reason, ie., need, for the word "forum" other than as a label for the resulting application. Probably the constraints would have to counter various loopholes in the RFC's as well. Received on Mon Dec 01 2008 - 15:19:17 CET