Re: Long column names...Performance issues?

From: -CELKO- <jcelko212_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <26c238b5-bfed-4eff-ac8b-4acc84470c7a_at_k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>

>> I would like to hear from the community what you all feel are best practices regarding naming conventions, and how they affect your environment. <<

Get a few copies of SQL PROGRAMMING STYLE and use it to set shop standards. It is based on the ISO-11179 rules and research that we did decades ago on code readability. It also has the advantage of being an outside source so you can avoid internal fights -- blame Celko instead of each other :). Received on Fri Nov 21 2008 - 14:29:19 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: JOG: "Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer"
Previous message: Roy Hann: "Re: Long column names...Performance issues?"
In reply to: chenthorn: "Long column names...Performance issues?"
In reply to chenthorn: "Long column names...Performance issues?"
Next in thread: JOG: "Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message