Long column names...Performance issues?
From: chenthorn <carlhe_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <6f87ba84-7922-4965-8ebe-a8e7a213e8ee@d42g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <6f87ba84-7922-4965-8ebe-a8e7a213e8ee@d42g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
My group is working to create a new set of Db standards as we embark
upon redesigning our new web app backend db. The other architect wants
every table/column/variable name to be unabbreviated and as
descriptive as possible. This of course leads to long and ungainly
names. while this is all well and fine in theory, when writing a lot
of code, long column names are no fun and often lead to bugs due to
spelling errors (Not that I would know anything about that )
I would like to hear from the community what you all feel are best practices regarding naming conventions, and how they affect your environment.
Thanks in advance! Received on Wed Nov 19 2008 - 11:29:27 CST
