Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:24:13 -0300
Message-ID: <4907bb40$0$5498$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>


Srubys_at_gmail.com wrote:

> greetings
>
> Sorry for not replying sooner
>
>>> But is C always dependent on A simply because B is dependent on A or…

Please don't delete the attributions. It makes it impossible to figure out who said what. Received on Wed Oct 29 2008 - 02:24:13 CET

Original text of this message