Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce
From: Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.spamfilter_at_virtualinfinity.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:40:13 -0700
Message-ID: <48f95a12$0$9482$7836cce5_at_newsrazor.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:40:13 -0700
Message-ID: <48f95a12$0$9482$7836cce5_at_newsrazor.net>
Daniel Pitts wrote:
> I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
> on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.
>
> Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
> I'm just now finding?
>
> Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
> efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel.
Never mind. I realized that part of RDBMS involves filtering. I don't
know why I didn't think of it right away, its the most obvious part of
rdbms :-) Must be a Friday :-)
-- Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>Received on Sat Oct 18 2008 - 05:40:13 CEST