Re: Examples of SQL anomalies?
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:48:30 -0400
>"JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote in message
>I normally accord to the definitions:
>information = datum + meaning
>datum = value + description
>These are useful, succinct and accord nicely with [ISO 2382-1:1984]:
>“Data: A representation of facts, concepts, or instructions in a
>normalized manner suitable for communication, interpretation, or
>processing by humans or by automatic means”, while giving something a
>bit more formalized in terms of data theory.
>In terms of defining value both the output of a function or the
>element of a set seem fine, but then defining a value as being some
>amount or quantity also seems fine.
I have a different take:
A value has no value except that which is assigned to it under an interpretation: a value is not the output of just /any/ function, but rather /the/ function that maps language terms to what those terms mean.
A datum is simply a formatted value that cannot be broken down into a
collection of component values that means the same thing.
Data is just formatted information.
Data is just formatted information.Received on Thu Jul 03 2008 - 22:48:30 CEST