Re: How is Behavior Specified
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:01:18 -0300
Message-ID: <47f634b3$0$4076$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> The short answer is: anyway you want -- so long as the specification
> semantics are compliant with the UML execution meta model.
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:01:18 -0300
Message-ID: <47f634b3$0$4076$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
H. S. Lahman wrote:
> Responding to Cressey...
>
>> How is behavior specified? >> >> In particular, is the specification expressed as declaratives or as >> imperatives?
>
> The short answer is: anyway you want -- so long as the specification
> semantics are compliant with the UML execution meta model.
What the fuck does UML have to do with anything useful? Received on Fri Apr 04 2008 - 16:01:18 CEST