Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Eric <eric_at_deptj.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:52:34 +0000
Message-ID: <slrnfu2dm2.l7.eric_at_tasso.deptj.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:52:34 +0000
Message-ID: <slrnfu2dm2.l7.eric_at_tasso.deptj.demon.co.uk>
On 2008-03-19, Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 6:14 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>> I am not sure how Eric gets from there to EAV, and I think that's highly
>> speculative on Eric's part
>
> Some of the things Mr. Perryman said led me to believe he was
> discussing an EAV design. When I tried to either verify or dispel
> my impression by reviewing the thread, I wasn't able to either way.
> But I it seems I got a similar impression to Eric's.
>
>
> Marshall
Speculative, yes, but that's what it suggested. Glad I'm not the only one.
E. Received on Wed Mar 19 2008 - 16:52:34 CET