Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <73cb5234-24f5-45b3-868f-a1064d1e8ca7_at_d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
> Regards,
> Steven Perryman
Received on Mon Mar 17 2008 - 20:20:11 CET
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <73cb5234-24f5-45b3-868f-a1064d1e8ca7_at_d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
On 17 mar, 17:42, S Perryman <q..._at_q.com> wrote:
[Snipped gibberish]
The self aggrandizing ignorant was so badly busted on his incoherence
but he keeps on diverting the subject to etymology. I will now
simply ignore his crap. Nothing can be made from such a moron.
>
> Regards,
> Steven Perryman
Received on Mon Mar 17 2008 - 20:20:11 CET