Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Robert Martin <unclebob_at_objectmentor.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:35:06 -0500
Message-ID: <2008031312350623810-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
>
> No, but I have seen you be dismissive of ideas that someone capable of a
> data centered viewpoint would probably not have dismissed.
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:35:06 -0500
Message-ID: <2008031312350623810-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
On 2008-03-12 05:35:35 -0500, "David Cressey" <cressey73_at_verizon.net> said:
>
> "Robert Martin" <unclebob_at_objectmentor.com> wrote in message
> news:200803112125087826-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom...
>> On 2008-03-10 23:28:40 -0500, Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> said: >> >>> Clearly comp.object and comp.databases.theory form just >>> such a dyad, with data-centered vs. code-centered thinking >>> the unresolvable heart of the conflict. >> >> So, in this entire discussion, have you seen me attack database theory >> even once?
>
> No, but I have seen you be dismissive of ideas that someone capable of a
> data centered viewpoint would probably not have dismissed.
That's a fair point. I can't point to any incident, but I think it's likely. However, I can also say that by participating in these discussions I have learned to be a lot less dismissive, and have gained much more respect for the views expressed on c.d.t (though not for some of the bad odor'd participants).
-- Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) | email: unclebob_at_objectmentor.com Object Mentor Inc. | blog: www.butunclebob.com The Agile Transition Experts | web: www.objectmentor.com 800-338-6716 |Received on Thu Mar 13 2008 - 18:35:06 CET