Re: Flash to JOG
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:24:07 -0300
Message-ID: <47d9390b$0$4056$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net>
>
> I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol
> has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that
> the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a
> necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer
> distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else
> our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no
> programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the
> concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence.
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:24:07 -0300
Message-ID: <47d9390b$0$4056$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net>
JOG wrote:
> On Mar 13, 11:40 am, "David Cressey" <cresse..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>As you decide whether or not to respond to Perryman, please consider that >>there are a several of us who read what you write with interest. We may not >>always agree with you, put you have commanded a level of respect from us >>that makes Perryman's attempt at condescension ludicrous. >> >>You need not descend to his level to defend your reputation with us. And if >>you're trying to raise him to your level, good luck.
>
> I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol
> has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that
> the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a
> necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer
> distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else
> our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no
> programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the
> concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence.
Alphora's Dataphor Received on Thu Mar 13 2008 - 09:24:07 CDT