Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:04:10 -0300
Message-ID: <47d7fefe$0$4041$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> You "downplay" RDBMS. You compared queries to "assembler language" in
> one reply, for example. While not a direct "attack" it is the next
> nearest thing.
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:04:10 -0300
Message-ID: <47d7fefe$0$4041$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
topmind wrote:
> On Mar 11, 7:25 pm, Robert Martin <uncle..._at_objectmentor.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2008-03-10 23:28:40 -0500, Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> said: >> >>>Clearly comp.object and comp.databases.theory form just >>>such a dyad, with data-centered vs. code-centered thinking >>>the unresolvable heart of the conflict. >> >>So, in this entire discussion, have you seen me attack database theory >>even once?
>
> You "downplay" RDBMS. You compared queries to "assembler language" in
> one reply, for example. While not a direct "attack" it is the next
> nearest thing.
It's also incontrovertible proof of his profound ignorance. Received on Wed Mar 12 2008 - 17:04:10 CET