Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <95abb6fb-e5e1-4604-b0f9-9fe3d5bcfadc_at_e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <95abb6fb-e5e1-4604-b0f9-9fe3d5bcfadc_at_e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 9, 7:25 pm, "Yagotta B. Kidding" <y..._at_mymail.com> wrote:
> Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote in news:b5ab6022-5cea-45a1-
>
> Superficially, you can perform the translation, but the assignment
> required to imitate the projection makes any such language not
> referentially transparent. You may consider the non-transparency a non-
> issue of course.
Um, how so? I'm not sure I see what you mean.
Marshall
Received on Mon Mar 10 2008 - 04:50:07 CET