Re: Object-relational impedence

Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

>[Snipped]
>> Sorry. I should have been more explicit. I perfectly understand the
>> relationship between assembler to machine language. I just do not see
>> how one could use the term *cardinality* for that. I may seem picky
>> on terminology but I do believe it is an apprpriate term to use.
>Typo. Sorry. I meant
>
>but I dot *not* believe it is an appropriate term to use. One word
>can make an entire difference.

     You were the one who introduced the term "cardinality" in reply to a poster who mentioned the near 1-to-1 mapping of assembly code to machine code.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.